The Influence of Closing the Abdominal Donor-Site Superficial Fascial System in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The superficial fascial system is routinely closed to alleviate tension at the abdominal donor site after harvest of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap (DIEP) for breast reconstruction. This is thought to decrease rates of wound dehiscence and improve contour postoperatively. There has been no comparative analysis on closure of the superficial fascial system and its effect on donor-site outcomes. METHODS: The authors retrospectively evaluated outcomes of DIEP flap breast reconstructions performed between 2017 and 2019. After May of 2018, the surgeons collectively agreed to stop closure of the superficial fascial system. All subsequent patients underwent closure of rectus abdominis fascia followed by skin closure. Patient demographic data and abdominal donor-site comorbidities were recorded between the superficial fascial system closure and no-superficial fascial system closure groups. Representative photographs of patients from the two groups were blindly assessed for scar appearance and contour using previously published grading scales. The results were compared. RESULTS: DIEP flap breast reconstruction was performed in 103 consecutive women. Among patients with abdominal donor-site reconstruction, 66 had superficial fascial system closure and 37 did not. There was not a significant difference in fat necrosis or wound dehiscence between the two groups (p = 0.29 and p = 0.39, respectively). Postoperative abdominal scar and contour were evaluated by 10 independent raters and showed no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Omission of superficial fascial system closure resulted in no difference in wound dehiscence or fat necrosis rates and aesthetic appearance of the abdominal scar and contour. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Split-thickness skin graft donor-site morbidity: A systematic literature review.

The purpose of this systematic literature review is to critically evaluate split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor-site morbidities. The search of peer-reviewed articles in three databases from January 2009 to July 2019 identified 4271 English-language publications reporting STSG donor-site clinical outcomes, complications, or quality of life. Of these studies, 77 met inclusion criteria for analysis. Mean time to donor-site epithelialization ranged from 4.7 to 35.0 days. Mean pain scores (0-10 scale) ranged from 1.24 to 6.38 on postoperative Day 3. Mean scar scores (0-13 scale) ranged from 0 to 10.9 at Year 1. One study reported 28% of patients had donor-site scar hypertrophy at 8 years. Infection rates were generally low but ranged from 0 to 56%. Less frequently reported outcomes included pruritus, wound exudation, and esthetic dissatisfaction. Donor-site wounds underwent days of wound care and were frequently associated with pain and scarring. Widespread variations were noted in STSG donor-site outcomes likely due to inconsistencies in the definition of outcomes and utilization of various assessment tools. Understanding the true burden of donor sites may drive innovative treatments that would reduce the use of STSGs and address the associated morbidities.

Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with peroneus longus tendon versus hamstring tendon: a comparison of functional outcome and donor site morbidity.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the differences in clinical outcome and donor site morbidity between the Peroneus Longus Tendon (PLT) and Hamstring Tendon (HT) in single-bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) reconstruction. METHODS: Patients with an isolated PCL injury underwent single-bundle PCL reconstruction using consecutive sampling. Patients were allocated into two groups (PLT and HT) and prospectively observed. The tendon graft diameter was measured intraoperatively. Functional scores (IKDC, Lysholm, and modified Cincinnati scores) were recorded preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. The thigh circumference and functional score according to the Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) were recorded to evaluate the morbidities in the ankle. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (hamstring n = 27, peroneus n = 28) met the inclusion criteria. The diameter of the PLT graft (8.2 ± 0.6 mm) was comparable to that of the HT graft (8.3 ± 0.5 mm). Both groups had excellent postoperative knee functional outcome scores. The mean AOFAS and FADI scores were excellent, with no difference in thigh circumference between the groups. CONCLUSION: PLT is a good choice as a graft in PCL reconstruction at the 2-year follow-up, with minimal donor site morbidity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Decreasing donor site morbidity after groin vascularized lymph node transfer with lessons learned from a 12-year experience and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Donor site morbidity related to vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) remains a cause of worry among surgeons. As such, our study explores donor site morbidity after VLNT with or without concomitant deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. Furthermore, we evaluate our surgical approach to ascertain whether it reduces the morbidity rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of donor site complications and surgical techniques was performed from 2006 to 2018. The patients' medical histories and demographic data were analyzed for risk factors. Patients were contacted by telephone for a long-term follow-up questionnaire. A literature review was implemented to evaluate the reported donor site complications and surgical strategies in literature. Complications were evaluated with and without concomitant autologous breast reconstruction (DIEP flap). RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were included in our case series. Sixty-five cases (73%) were combined with DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Seroma rate diminished from 60% in the first 39 cases to 18% in the last five years (50 cases) (p < 0,001). Lymphedema of the afferent lower limb is described in the literature but did not occur in our series. CONCLUSIONS: Seroma formation is the most common donor site morbidity after groin VLNT flap harvest, particularly when combined with DIEP flap breast reconstruction. This paper contains the largest reported series of combined VLNT + DIEP flaps and describes surgical strategies on how to decrease seroma formation and avoid iatrogenic lymphedema of the lower limb.

Comparing Outcomes of Robotically Assisted Latissimus Dorsi Harvest to the Traditional Open Approach in Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Robotically assisted latissimus dorsi harvest permits harvest of the latissimus dorsi muscle without a back incision, as compared to the traditional open technique. The authors hypothesized that robotic harvest has lower donor-site complication rates, decreased opioid requirements, and a shorter length of stay than the traditional open technique. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all consecutive pedicled latissimus dorsi flaps for breast reconstruction between 2011 and 2015. All procedures were conducted by two surgeons who performed both robotic and open cases. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were identified; 25 underwent robotically assisted latissimus dorsi harvest and 27 underwent the open technique. Demographic data between the two groups were similar. Median length of stay for robotic harvest was shorter than that for the traditional technique (2 days versus 3 days; p = 0.031). Postoperative morphine requirement was less in the robotic compared to the traditional technique, but the difference was not significant (158 mg versus 184 mg; p = 0.826). Seroma rate was higher in the robotic group (16 percent versus 0 percent; p = 0.034). The mean duration of surgery was longer in the robotic cohort (388 minutes versus 311 minutes; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates robotically assisted latissimus dorsi harvest as an effective alternative to the traditional open technique in select patients. Advantages of robotic harvest include no back scar, a shorter length of stay, and lower opioid requirements, although the difference was not significant; disadvantages include longer operative time and a higher seroma rate. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Course of scar quality of donor sites following split skin graft harvesting: Comparison between patients and observers.

There exists little to no data on the development of donor-site scars that remain after split skin graft harvesting. The objectives of this study were to (a) examine changes in characteristics of donor-site scar quality over time and (b) assess the agreement between patient-reported and observer-reported donor-site scar quality in a burn population. A prospective cohort study was conducted including patients who underwent split skin grafting for their burn injury. Patients and observers completed the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) for the first harvested donor site at 3 and 12 months post-surgery. This study included 80 patients with a median age of 34 years. At 3 months post-surgery, the patients scored the POSAS items itch and color as most deviant from normal skin, both improved between 3 and 12 months (3.1 vs 1.5 and 5.0 vs 3.5, respectively [P < .001]). Other scar characteristics did not show significant change over time. The patients' overall opinion score improved from 3.9 to 3.2 (P < .001). Observers rated the items vascularization and pigmentation most severe, only vascularization improved significantly between both time points. Their overall opinion score decreased from 2.7 to 2.3 (P < .001). The inter-observer agreement between patients and observers was considered poor (ICC < 0.4) at both time points. Results of current study indicate that observers underestimate the impact of donor-site scars. This has to be kept in mind while guiding therapy and expectations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, prospective cohort study.

Lower donor site morbidity and higher patient satisfaction with epidermal grafting in comparison to split thickness skin grafting: A randomized controlled trial (EPIGRAAFT Trial).

BACKGROUND: Split thickness skin grafting (SSG) is an important modality for wound coverage; however, it leads to donor site morbidity. Epidermal grafting (EG) is a promising option for autologous skin grafting which offers minimal donor site morbidity, though it is not known if EG is an effective clinical alternative for SSG. This study compared the efficacy of EG as an alternative to SSG in terms of wound healing outcomes, donor site morbidity, patient satisfaction and adverse events. METHODS: EPIGRAAFT is a Phase 2, randomized, open-label trial with two parallel groups: EG and SSG. Patients referred for skin grafting with a healthy granulating wound bed were included. The co-primary endpoints were the proportion of wounds healed and donor site healing time. The secondary endpoints include donor site morbidity measured using Vancouver Scar Scale, mean time for complete wound healing, patient satisfaction assessed using a validated skin grafting questionnaire and incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Of the 61 patients screened, 44 patients were randomized. There was no difference in the proportion of wounds healed at 6 weeks (p=0.366) and 3 months(p=0.24) as well as the mean time for wound healing (p=0.12). EG resulted in lower donor site morbidity (p=0.001), faster donor site healing time (EG: 4.86 days vs. SSG: 21.32 days) (p<0.0001), and higher overall satisfaction (p<0.001). There were no adverse events reported. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that EG has superior donor site outcomes with faster donor site healing and lower morbidity compared to SSG, while having comparable wound healing outcomes. Patients receiving EG also experienced higher donor site satisfaction compared to SSG. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02535481.

Posterior Tibial Artery Flap with an Adipofascial Extension: Clinical Application in Head and Neck Reconstruction with Detailed Insight into Septocutaneous Perforators and Donor-Site Morbidity.

BACKGROUND: The general aim of this study is to describe a new modification to the posterior tibial artery flap and its clinical application in head and neck reconstruction and to investigate the distribution of septocutaneous perforators of the posterior tibial artery. The specific aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of this new modification to the posterior tibial artery flap and describe the flap survival rate and donor-site morbidity. METHODS: From November of 2017 to August of 2018, 85 consecutive patients underwent posterior tibial artery flap reconstruction of the head and neck region after tumor extirpation. All posterior tibial artery flaps were harvested with a long adipofascial extension, and donor-site defects were closed with a triangular full-thickness skin graft harvested adjacent to the flap. Special consideration was given to the harvesting technique, distribution of the posterior tibial artery septocutaneous perforators, flap outcomes, and associated donor-site morbidity. RESULTS: Flap survival was 100 percent. The number of septocutaneous perforators varied from one to five per leg, with a mean of 2.61 ± 1.15, and the septocutaneous perforators were mostly clustered in the middle and distal thirds of the medial surface of the leg. The prevalence of the presence of one, two, three, four, and five septocutaneous perforators per leg was 7, 33, 27, 19, and 14 percent, respectively. Total and partial skin graft loss at the donor site was reported in two and six patients, respectively, who were managed conservatively. There was no statistically significant difference when comparing the preoperative and postoperative range of ankle movements (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This new modification to the posterior tibial artery flap allows for the incorporation of more septocutaneous perforators into the flap, omits the need for a second donor site to close the donor-site defect, and provides sufficient tissue to fill the dead space after tumor resection and neck dissection. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Gender Disparity between Donor Sites of the Trochlea Used for Autologous Osteoarticular Transfer: An MRI Analysis.

The purpose of this study was to assess potential gender differences in size of the lateral and medial trochlea of the male and female knee as well as the variation within gender of potential osteochondral autograft transfer (OAT) donor site area. Two hundred and twelve skeletally mature patients, 106 males and 106 females, who underwent a 3T magnetic resonance imaging of the knee for a variety of indications were utilized for analysis. Exclusion criteria included degenerative arthritis, trochlear dysplasia, and poor image quality. Medial and lateral femoral trochlear cartilage width was obtained using a linear radiologic measurement tool. Widths were measured from a reproducible anatomic location representing the maximal trochlear dimension in a region where donor plugs are commonly harvested. Trochlear width was also plotted as a function of patient height. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-sample t-test. The mean and standard deviation of the lateral trochlear cartilage width (mm) for males and females were 23.38 +/- 2.14 and 20.44 +/- 2.16, respectively (p < 0.00001). The mean and standard deviation of the medial trochlear cartilage width (mm) for males and females were 14.16 +/- 2.17 and 11.78 +/- 2.03, respectively (p < 0.00001). The overall range in trochlear width for both the lateral and medial sides was 22.22 and 19.73 mm for males and females, respectively. A graft measuring 10 mm could represent as little as 34% of the lateral trochlea in males versus as much as 65% in females. Our results indicate that donor OAT plug diameter relative to available trochlear cartilage width will vary significantly both between genders and individual patients. Trochlear width variability and its potential implications on donor site morbidity may be an important consideration when contemplating osteochondral plug harvest for OAT or other indications. The level of evidence is IV.

Regrafting of the Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor-Site: Is It Beneficial?

Split-thickness skin grafting remains a fundamental treatment for patients with deep burns and other traumatic injuries. Unfortunately, the donor site wound that remains after split skin graft (SSG) harvesting may also cause problems for the patient; they can lead to discomfort and scars with a poor cosmetic outcome. Regrafting of the donor site is one of the methods described to improve donor site healing and scarring. In this report, we describe a case of a 26-year-old woman with a self-inflicted chemical burn (0.5% TBSA) who underwent split skin grafting. During surgery, only part of the donor site was regrafted with split skin graft remnants. This part healed faster and had a better scar quality at 3 months postsurgery. Nevertheless, the appearance and patients' opinion on the regrafted part deteriorated after 12 months. With this case report, we aim to create awareness of the long-term consequences of regrafting, which may differ from short-time results. Patients expected to have poor reepithelialization potential may benefit from regrafting of the SSG on the donor site. But in healthy young individuals, timewise there would be no benefit since it can lead to an aesthetically displeasing result.

Dermatome-Induced Lacerations: An Unspoken Problem in Burn Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Dermatome-induced lacerations are a known complication; however, there is a paucity of literature discussing the incidence and predisposing factors. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and risk factors to develop a preventive algorithm. METHODS: An 18-question survey was sent to all US and Canadian burn unit directors. Surgeons were queried about type and location of their practices, average annual caseload of skin graft harvesting, and number of dermatome-induced lacerations. The survey also asked about donor site location, harvesting technique and equipment, laceration severity, and causative factors. An algorithm was developed based on the results. RESULTS: Fifty-six responses (42% response rate) were received from the burn unit directors. They reported an estimated 133 lacerations over the past 5 y. The overall incidence of dermatome-induced lacerations was approximately 0.1% per year (1.3 per 1000 cases). The most commonly attributed causes were excessive pressure (25.0%) and patient factors (18.4%). Most lacerations occurred when using air dermatomes (73.0%) with a 4-inch guard (63.5%), 0.010- to 0.015-inch thickness (78.4%), and 30°-45° angulation (47.3%); the most common brand was Zimmer (71.6%). The dermatome was typically set up by a scrub tech or nurse (48.6%), whereas the skin harvesting was performed by residents (39.2%) or attendings (35.1%). Lacerations typically extended to subcutaneous tissue (70.3%), with no neurovascular injury (86.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that dermatome-induced lacerations are rare events and that certain factors predispose patients to injury. An algorithm was developed to provide guidance on risk factor identification and the set up and use of dermatomes.

Donor Site Evaluation After Osteochondral Autograft Transplantation for Capitellar Osteochondritis Dissecans.

BACKGROUND: Osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT) for capitellar osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) requires harvesting of tissue from the asymptomatic knee joint. However, donor site morbidity (DSM) in such cases remains unclear. PURPOSE: To evaluate DSM and postoperative radiographic findings in patients undergoing OAT for advanced capitellar OCD. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Eighty-six juvenile athletes underwent OAT for advanced capitellar OCD. The 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score, rate of return to sports, and symptoms in the donor knee were assessed at a mean follow-up of 86 months (range, 28-185 months). Additionally, 49 of the 86 patients were assessed by radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of the knee donor site. DSM was defined according to the usual criterion (persistent symptoms for >1 year or the need for subsequent intervention) and a stricter criterion (the presence of any symptoms, such as effusion, patellofemoral complaints, crepitation, unspecified disturbance, stiffness, pain/instability during activities, and osteoarthritic change). The stricter criterion was also used to allocate patients into a DSM group and a no-DSM group. RESULTS: Two and 11 patients were determined to have DSM according to the usual and stricter criteria, respectively. All patients returned to the competitive level of their sports. The mean International Knee Documentation Committee score was 99.0. MRI findings showed abnormal signal intensity in 17 patients (35%) and hypertrophic changes in 11 patients (22%) at the donor harvest sites. The MOCART (magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue) score was higher in the no-DSM group (mean, 68.2) than in the DSM group (mean, 52.9) (P = .027). CONCLUSION: OAT for juvenile athletes with advanced capitellar OCD provided good clinical outcomes. The DSM rate was relatively low (2.3%) with the usual criterion but high (12.8%) with the stricter criterion. MRI showed an abnormal signal intensity and hypertrophy in some cases.

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Hypertrophic Scarring of Split Thickness Autograft Donor Sites in a Pediatric Burn Population.

TITLE: Prevalence and Risk Factors for Hypertrophic Scarring of Split Thickness Autograft Donor Sites in a Pediatric Burn Population. OBJECTIVE: The split-thickness autograft remains a fundamental treatment for burn injuries; however, donor sites may remain hypersensitive, hyperemic, less pliable, and develop hypertrophic scarring. This study sought to assess the long-term scarring of donor sites after pediatric burns. METHODS: A retrospective review of pediatric burn patients treated at a single institution (2010-2016) was performed. Primary outcomes were prevalence of donor site hypertrophic scarring, scarring time course, and risk factor assessment. RESULTS: 237 pediatric burn patients were identified. Mean age at burn was 7 yrs., mean %TBSA was 26% with 17% being Full Thickness. Mean follow-up was 2.4 yrs. Hypertrophic scarring was observed in 152 (64%) patients with 81 (34%) patients having persistent hypertrophic scarring through long-term follow-up. Patient-specific risk factors for hypertrophic scarring were Hispanic ethnicity (P=0.03), increased %TBSA (P=0.03), %Full Thickness burn (P=0.02) and total autograft amount (P=0.03). Donor site factors for hypertrophic scarring were longer time to epithelialization (P<0.0001), increased donor site harvest depth (P<0.0001), autografts harvested in the acute burn setting (P=0.008), and thigh donor site location (vs. all other sites; P<0.0001). The scalp, arm, foot, and lower leg donor sites (vs. all other sites) were less likely to develop HTS (P<0.0001, 0.02, 0.005, 0.002, respectively), along with a history of previous donor site harvest (P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Hypertrophic scarring is a prominent burden in donor site wounds of pediatric burn patients. Knowledge of pertinent risk factors can assist with guiding management and expectations.

Stacked Profunda Artery Perforator Flap for Breast Reconstruction in Failed or Unavailable Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap.

BACKGROUND: Recently, the profunda artery perforator flap has become one of the popular flap choices for patients who desire autologous breast reconstruction but are not optimal candidates for deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap surgery. These patients are not ideal patients for DIEP flap surgery because of having poor perforators, previous abdominal operations, low body mass index, or previously used/failed DIEP flap. In their institution, the authors have performed stacked profunda artery perforator flaps for these patients to provide full volumetric and aesthetic reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective review of 20 patients (40 flaps) who underwent stacked profunda artery perforator flap surgery from 2014 to 2018 was performed. Patient characteristics, demographics, and flap data were collected. RESULTS: Forty flaps were used to reconstruct 20 breasts in 20 patients. The mean age of patients was 51.5 years (range, 38 to 74 years), the average body mass index was 27.3 kg/m(2) (range, 21.0 to 34.4 kg/m(2)), and the mean flap weight was 398.5 g (range, 170 to 600 g). The majority of anastomoses were performed in internal mammary vessels (60 percent), followed by thoracodorsal (10 percent), serratus (10 percent), and side branch of profunda artery perforator vessels (20 percent). There were no flap losses, and two patients experienced donor-site wound dehiscence. CONCLUSIONS: Stacking profunda artery perforator flaps is an innovative yet technically challenging choice of flap for autologous breast reconstruction. It can provide an aesthetically pleasing result in the appropriately selected patient, and we recommend this technique in patients who are not optimal candidates for DIEP flap surgery because of previous flap failure or unavailable donor site. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Treatment of Large Scars in Children Using Artificial Dermis and Scalp Skin Grafting.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Large scars formed after burns injury can seriously hamper appearance and function in children. Surgical resection of scars and secondary skin or flap grafting often brings severe damages to donor sites, which may lead to physiological and psychological development disorders in children. Here, we introduce the use of artificial dermis and skin grafts from scalps to treat large scars in children to minimize the donor site morbidity. METHODS: A retrospective char review was performed including 7 children with large scars between January 2016 and December 2017. First, the scars were resected, and artificial dermis was applied to the secondary wounds. Twelve days later, outer silicone membrane was removed. Another 2 days later, scalp skin grafts of 0.3 mm were transplanted to the wounds. Manchester Scar Scale and Visual Analog Scale were used to evaluate scar appearance before and after the treatment respectively. One special patient with extensive scars was treated twice at an interval of 1 year. The first therapy was performed with both conventional method of resection and skin grafting and the new method described above. In the second therapy, 4 samples were taken from 4 different sites-the normal skin, scars, the skin where artificial dermis and scalp skin grafting were performed, and the skin where only scalp skin grafting was performed. H-E staining, Masson staining, Aldehyde fuchsin staining, and scanning electron microscopy were used for histological observation. RESULTS: All skin grafts survived well. The Manchester Scar Scale score of the graft area was significantly reduced (P < 0.01) after the treatment. Histological examination showed obviously better dermis arrangement where artificial dermis and scalp grafting was performed. CONCLUSION: The therapy achieves better appearances and minimizes donor site morbidity. It is beneficial to physical and psychological development of children and provides an alternative to treat children with large scars.

Osteochondral Autograft Transplantation Technique Augmented by an Ultrapurified Alginate Gel Enhances Osteochondral Repair in a Rabbit Model.

BACKGROUND: One of the most important limitations of osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT) is the adverse effect on donor sites in the knee. To decrease the number and/or size of osteochondral defects, we devised a method with biomaterial implantation after OAT. HYPOTHESIS: OAT augmented by ultrapurified alginate (UPAL) gel enhances cartilage repair capacity. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Seventy-five osteochondral defects in rabbits were divided into 3 groups: osteochondral defects with OAT alone, defects with OAT augmented by UPAL gel (combined group), and defects without intervention as controls. Macroscopic and histological evaluations of the reparative tissues were performed at 4 and 12 weeks postoperatively. Histological evaluation of graft cartilage degradation was also performed. To evaluate the effects of UPAL gel on graft healing, repaired bone volumes and osseointegration of the graft were evaluated. Collagen orientation and the mechanical properties of the reparative tissue and graft cartilage were also evaluated qualitatively. RESULTS: The macroscopic and histological evaluations of the combined group were significantly superior to the other groups at 12 weeks postoperatively. Regarding degenerative change of the graft, the histological scores of the combined group were significantly higher than those of the OAT-alone group. The values of repaired subchondral bone volumes and osseointegration of the graft were almost identical in both groups. Collagen orientation and the mechanical properties of the reparative tissue and graft cartilage were significantly better in the combined group than in the other groups. CONCLUSION: Administration of UPAL gel in OAT enhanced cartilage repair and protected graft cartilage without inhibiting subchondral bone repair and graft survival. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: OAT augmented by UPAL gel decreases the number and/or size of osteochondral grafts, minimizing the risk of donor site morbidity. This combination technique has the potential to improve clinical outcomes and expand the surgical indications for OAT.

The role of recruited minced skin grafting in improving the quality of healing at the donor site of split-thickness skin graft-A comparative study.

INTRODUCTION: The donor area of split thickness skin graft harvest usually takes 2-3 weeks to heal. A few studies have shown that application of minced skin grafting helps to reduce this time. The objective of this comparative study was to find the role of recruited minced skin grafting on the overall quality of healing at the split thickness skin graft donor area. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 30 patients undergoing split thickness skin graft for acute traumatic wounds. We selected two donor areas of nearly equal size on medial and lateral side of either thigh in each case. They were randomly allocated to control area and study area using an envelope technique. Minced graft was applied over the study area. Same dressing and post operative care were done for both the areas. RESULTS: In our study we found average time for complete epithelialization at control area was 28.17+/-5.590days whereas it was 21.93+/-2.420days in the study area. The earlier epithelialisation time of study area compared to control area was significant on statistical analysis. Vancouver scar scale (VSS) comparison at third month and one year follow up showed significant difference of scores (1 versus 0) as the scars were hypopigmented at control area and comparatively better pigmented at study area. We found visual analogue score for Pain and pruritus to be better for study area at the end of first, second and third month. CONCLUSION: In this study we conclude that, recruited minced skin grafting to the donor site of split skin graft leads to better quality of healing in terms of early epithelialisation, better quality of scar, better pigmentation, less pain and pruritus, thus leading to improved quality of healing.